Anthony horton

Places:  Is Our Collective Consciousness Leading Us To A ‘Victorianesque’ Place Where Self-Righteous Indignation Is The Norm?

Pablo Picasso once observed, “Taste is the enemy of creativity.” At its heart, the sentiment reflects the idea that adhering to conventional aesthetics and values can be restrictive, if not detrimental, to the creative process. This timeless idea has profound implications for our modern age, particularly in the realm of social censure and the growing consensus around ‘good taste.’

The Underpinnings of ‘Taste’

Traditionally, ‘taste’ referred to an appreciation for beauty, grounded in cultural, educational, and societal norms. These norms dictated what was aesthetically pleasing, which art forms were ‘superior’, and which narratives deserved attention. The inherent danger is obvious: When you hold art — a form meant to challenge, question, and innovate — to a static set of standards, you threaten its very essence.

The Modern Evolution: Social Censure

Fast forward to the digital age, where ‘taste’ has evolved into a complex nexus of social media likes, shares, and algorithmically curated content. The echo chambers of the internet have created a new form of ‘good taste,’ wherein the popularity and virality of a narrative or piece of art often supersede its intrinsic value or intent. It’s within this framework that social censure — the repression or criticism of ideas deemed sensitive or inappropriate — takes root.

Today, there’s an increasing tendency to align ‘good taste’ with being politically correct, non-controversial, and inoffensive. This alignment means that art or ideas that challenge established norms or tread on sensitive topics risk censure, boycotts, or ostracization. While it’s crucial to be respectful and sensitive to the myriad of perspectives in our diverse world, it’s equally important not to stifle voices that seek to question, challenge, or even provoke.

The Cost to Creativity

By equating ‘good taste’ with a narrow band of socially acceptable narratives, we risk alienating art forms that can initiate vital dialogues. Creativity flourishes when boundaries are pushed, when the status quo is interrogated, and when artists feel free to express without the looming shadow of social censure.

When artists self-censor out of fear, their works may remain palatable, but they also become sterile, devoid of the rich complexities and nuances that true creativity can bring forth. This not only diminishes the value of the art itself but also deprives society of the chance to engage with and learn from challenging perspectives.

Reimagining ‘Taste’ in the Age of Social Censure

In the interest of never posing a problem without, at a minimum, offering a potential solution, I’d like to address a possible answer to this situation. For art to reclaim its transformative power, we must recalibrate our understanding of ‘taste.’ Instead of viewing it as a static set of standards, we should celebrate taste as an evolving palette that embraces the full spectrum of human experience, emotion, and thought.

The antidote to the stifling effect of social censure is not to abandon sensitivity or respect, but to foster environments where artists can engage with challenging topics thoughtfully and audiences can approach art with an open, critical mind.

In conclusion, Picasso’s insight into the constraints of ‘taste’ remains as relevant today as ever. By challenging our own preconceptions and fostering a culture of openness, we can ensure that creativity continues to shine, unencumbered by the restrictive chains of the past or present.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *